2010 NFL Catch Percentage Leaders
Share of targets caught
Felix Jones led the whole NFL in catch percentage in 2010 with 92.3%, 5.6 percentage points ahead of LeSean McCoy (86.7%). It stands 7th among all single seasons in NFL history.
Showing players who met 1.875 receptions per team game. Show all players
Led the whole NFL in 2010
Felix Jones
Dallas Cowboys
92.3%
Catch Percentage
5.6% clear of LeSean McCoy
Showing Catch Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | CTH% | G | REC | YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
DAL | 92.3% | 16 | 48 | 450 | 1 |
| 2 |
|
PHI | 86.7% | 15 | 78 | 592 | 2 |
| 3 |
|
ATL | 86.3% | 14 | 44 | 303 | 3 |
| 4 |
|
GB | 86.0% | 16 | 43 | 342 | 1 |
| 5 |
|
IND | 81.4% | 9 | 57 | 617 | 8 |
| 6 |
|
NYG | 81.0% | 16 | 47 | 314 | 0 |
| 7 |
|
NO | 81.0% | 8 | 34 | 208 | 1 |
| 8 |
|
CLE | 79.2% | 16 | 61 | 477 | 2 |
| 9 |
|
LAC | 78.7% | 16 | 59 | 520 | 2 |
| 10 |
|
MIA | 78.6% | 16 | 33 | 242 | 0 |
| 11 |
|
HOU | 78.6% | 16 | 66 | 604 | 2 |
| 12 |
|
NE | 77.3% | 15 | 34 | 379 | 1 |
| 13 |
|
JAX | 77.3% | 14 | 34 | 317 | 2 |
| 14 |
|
TEN | 77.2% | 16 | 44 | 245 | 1 |
| 15 |
|
DEN | 77.1% | 13 | 37 | 372 | 3 |
| 16 |
|
LV | 77.0% | 13 | 47 | 507 | 3 |
| 17 |
|
LAC | 76.9% | 10 | 50 | 782 | 10 |
| 18 |
|
BAL | 76.8% | 16 | 63 | 556 | 1 |
| 19 |
|
LA | 75.4% | 16 | 46 | 383 | 0 |
| 20 |
|
DAL | 73.4% | 16 | 94 | 1,002 | 9 |
| 21 |
|
CHI | 72.9% | 16 | 51 | 547 | 3 |
| 22 |
|
DET | 72.5% | 15 | 58 | 487 | 2 |
| 23 |
|
SEA | 72.1% | 11 | 31 | 354 | 0 |
| 24 |
|
IND | 72.0% | 13 | 67 | 631 | 4 |
| 25 |
|
MIN | 72.0% | 15 | 36 | 341 | 1 |
| 26 |
|
TB | 71.9% | 16 | 46 | 355 | 1 |
| 27 |
|
NE | 71.2% | 16 | 42 | 546 | 10 |
| 28 |
|
NO | 70.5% | 12 | 31 | 356 | 5 |
| 29 |
|
KC | 70.3% | 16 | 45 | 468 | 3 |
| 30 |
|
GB | 70.3% | 16 | 45 | 582 | 2 |
| 31 |
|
NE | 70.3% | 14 | 45 | 563 | 6 |
| 32 |
|
CIN | 70.3% | 15 | 52 | 600 | 3 |
| 33 |
|
NO | 70.2% | 15 | 66 | 763 | 8 |
| 34 |
|
CAR | 70.2% | 16 | 40 | 310 | 0 |
| 35 |
|
NE | 69.9% | 15 | 86 | 848 | 7 |
| 36 |
|
IND | 69.8% | 6 | 37 | 347 | 3 |
| 37 |
|
NO | 69.5% | 13 | 41 | 408 | 3 |
| 38 |
|
TEN | 69.2% | 13 | 36 | 318 | 4 |
| 39 |
|
LA | 69.1% | 16 | 85 | 689 | 3 |
| 40 |
|
DAL | 68.8% | 15 | 33 | 260 | 0 |
| 41 |
|
PHI | 68.0% | 16 | 51 | 573 | 1 |
| 42 |
|
TB | 67.3% | 16 | 66 | 730 | 5 |
| 43 |
|
WAS | 67.2% | 14 | 39 | 309 | 2 |
| 44 |
|
NO | 66.7% | 16 | 44 | 638 | 5 |
| 45 |
|
CLE | 66.7% | 16 | 68 | 763 | 3 |
| 46 |
|
NE | 66.3% | 15 | 61 | 818 | 6 |
| 47 |
|
SEA | 66.0% | 16 | 33 | 249 | 0 |
| 48 |
|
BUF | 66.0% | 14 | 31 | 353 | 3 |
| 49 |
|
NYJ | 65.8% | 15 | 52 | 368 | 0 |
| 50 |
|
CHI | 65.7% | 14 | 46 | 561 | 3 |
1–50 of 144Next →