2017 NFC Catch Percentage Leaders
Share of targets caught
Shane Vereen led the NFC in catch percentage in 2017 with 83.0%, 1.3 percentage points ahead of Mark Ingram (81.7%).
Showing players who met 1.875 receptions per team game. Show all players
Led the NFC in 2017
Shane Vereen
New York Giants
83.0%
Catch Percentage
1.3% clear of Mark Ingram
Showing Catch Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | CTH% | G | REC | YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
NYG | 83.0% | 16 | 44 | 253 | 0 |
| 2 |
|
NO | 81.7% | 16 | 58 | 416 | 0 |
| 3 |
|
NO | 81.0% | 16 | 81 | 826 | 5 |
| 4 |
|
SF | 78.6% | 14 | 33 | 315 | 1 |
| 5 |
|
DET | 76.7% | 16 | 92 | 1,003 | 5 |
| 6 |
|
ATL | 76.6% | 14 | 36 | 317 | 1 |
| 7 |
|
NO | 75.7% | 15 | 53 | 787 | 4 |
| 8 |
|
ATL | 75.4% | 16 | 49 | 526 | 3 |
| 9 |
|
MIN | 75.0% | 16 | 51 | 421 | 2 |
| 10 |
|
CHI | 74.6% | 16 | 53 | 353 | 1 |
| 11 |
|
DET | 74.6% | 16 | 53 | 444 | 2 |
| 12 |
|
TB | 74.5% | 15 | 35 | 249 | 1 |
| 13 |
|
SEA | 73.9% | 12 | 34 | 266 | 2 |
| 14 |
|
LA | 73.6% | 15 | 64 | 788 | 6 |
| 15 |
|
TB | 73.5% | 16 | 61 | 631 | 1 |
| 16 |
|
DAL | 72.4% | 16 | 63 | 560 | 5 |
| 17 |
|
WAS | 72.2% | 10 | 39 | 510 | 4 |
| 18 |
|
GB | 71.7% | 14 | 66 | 653 | 4 |
| 19 |
|
ARI | 71.7% | 14 | 33 | 322 | 2 |
| 20 |
|
SF | 71.7% | 15 | 43 | 430 | 2 |
| 21 |
|
NYG | 70.8% | 13 | 34 | 193 | 1 |
| 22 |
|
CAR | 70.8% | 16 | 80 | 651 | 5 |
| 23 |
|
MIN | 70.4% | 16 | 57 | 532 | 8 |
| 24 |
|
NYG | 70.2% | 11 | 59 | 731 | 2 |
| 25 |
|
NO | 69.8% | 16 | 104 | 1,245 | 5 |
| 26 |
|
ATL | 69.8% | 15 | 67 | 703 | 5 |
| 27 |
|
WAS | 69.2% | 16 | 45 | 573 | 4 |
| 28 |
|
SF | 68.3% | 15 | 43 | 515 | 2 |
| 29 |
|
DAL | 67.9% | 16 | 53 | 568 | 0 |
| 30 |
|
ARI | 67.7% | 16 | 109 | 1,156 | 6 |
| 31 |
|
MIN | 67.4% | 14 | 64 | 849 | 8 |
| 32 |
|
PHI | 67.3% | 14 | 74 | 824 | 8 |
| 33 |
|
SF | 67.0% | 16 | 59 | 350 | 0 |
| 34 |
|
LA | 66.0% | 15 | 62 | 869 | 5 |
| 35 |
|
LA | 65.9% | 12 | 56 | 781 | 5 |
| 36 |
|
PHI | 65.3% | 16 | 62 | 768 | 8 |
| 37 |
|
CHI | 64.8% | 15 | 59 | 614 | 1 |
| 38 |
|
ATL | 64.7% | 16 | 33 | 378 | 1 |
| 39 |
|
SEA | 64.7% | 16 | 75 | 991 | 8 |
| 40 |
|
MIN | 64.1% | 16 | 91 | 1,276 | 4 |
| 41 |
|
WAS | 64.1% | 15 | 66 | 789 | 3 |
| 42 |
|
SEA | 63.4% | 16 | 45 | 555 | 2 |
| 43 |
|
GB | 63.2% | 14 | 74 | 885 | 10 |
| 44 |
|
CAR | 62.5% | 14 | 30 | 437 | 1 |
| 45 |
|
TB | 62.3% | 16 | 48 | 591 | 6 |
| 46 |
|
WAS | 62.3% | 16 | 43 | 648 | 3 |
| 47 |
|
TB | 61.8% | 15 | 34 | 525 | 1 |
| 48 |
|
DET | 61.6% | 16 | 53 | 574 | 4 |
| 49 |
|
DET | 61.2% | 13 | 30 | 399 | 1 |
| 50 |
|
GB | 60.2% | 14 | 53 | 482 | 6 |
1–50 of 68Next →