2011 AFC Catch Percentage Leaders
Share of targets caught
Ryan Mathews led the AFC in catch percentage in 2011 with 84.7%, 2.0 percentage points ahead of Reggie Bush (82.7%).
Showing players who met 1.875 receptions per team game. Show all players
Led the AFC in 2011
Ryan Mathews
Los Angeles Chargers
84.7%
Catch Percentage
2.0% clear of Reggie Bush
Showing Catch Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | CTH% | G | REC | YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LAC | 84.7% | 14 | 50 | 455 | 0 |
| 2 |
|
MIA | 82.7% | 15 | 43 | 296 | 1 |
| 3 |
|
BUF | 82.6% | 14 | 38 | 389 | 6 |
| 4 |
|
LV | 78.7% | 16 | 37 | 418 | 1 |
| 5 |
|
BUF | 78.0% | 10 | 39 | 442 | 0 |
| 6 |
|
HOU | 73.6% | 13 | 53 | 617 | 2 |
| 7 |
|
BUF | 73.6% | 16 | 39 | 269 | 2 |
| 8 |
|
NYJ | 73.2% | 16 | 30 | 211 | 0 |
| 9 |
|
BAL | 73.1% | 16 | 76 | 704 | 3 |
| 10 |
|
PIT | 73.0% | 14 | 46 | 381 | 2 |
| 11 |
|
LAC | 72.7% | 13 | 64 | 778 | 7 |
| 12 |
|
NE | 72.6% | 16 | 90 | 1,327 | 17 |
| 13 | Evan Moore | CLE | 72.3% | 15 | 34 | 324 | 4 |
| 14 |
|
TEN | 72.2% | 16 | 57 | 418 | 0 |
| 15 |
|
KC | 71.9% | 16 | 46 | 328 | 1 |
| 16 |
|
BAL | 71.4% | 15 | 40 | 405 | 3 |
| 17 |
|
NE | 70.5% | 16 | 122 | 1,569 | 9 |
| 18 |
|
NE | 69.9% | 14 | 79 | 910 | 7 |
| 19 |
|
NYJ | 68.9% | 14 | 42 | 449 | 2 |
| 20 |
|
LAC | 68.4% | 15 | 54 | 433 | 2 |
| 21 |
|
JAX | 68.3% | 16 | 43 | 374 | 3 |
| 22 |
|
LAC | 68.2% | 15 | 30 | 271 | 0 |
| 23 |
|
PIT | 68.0% | 16 | 51 | 631 | 2 |
| 24 |
|
HOU | 66.1% | 15 | 39 | 474 | 3 |
| 25 |
|
HOU | 64.7% | 7 | 33 | 492 | 2 |
| 26 |
|
PIT | 63.7% | 16 | 72 | 1,193 | 8 |
| 27 |
|
HOU | 63.5% | 15 | 54 | 677 | 3 |
| 28 |
|
KC | 62.2% | 16 | 61 | 785 | 2 |
| 29 |
|
BUF | 62.2% | 16 | 61 | 658 | 5 |
| 30 |
|
LAC | 61.4% | 12 | 43 | 856 | 5 |
| 31 |
|
CLE | 61.2% | 16 | 41 | 518 | 4 |
| 32 |
|
TEN | 61.2% | 16 | 74 | 1,023 | 7 |
| 33 | Lavelle Hawkins | TEN | 61.0% | 15 | 47 | 470 | 1 |
| 34 |
|
CIN | 60.9% | 14 | 56 | 596 | 6 |
| 35 |
|
BAL | 60.7% | 16 | 54 | 528 | 5 |
| 36 |
|
TEN | 60.5% | 16 | 49 | 759 | 3 |
| 37 |
|
MIA | 59.3% | 16 | 51 | 537 | 3 |
| 38 |
|
MIA | 59.3% | 15 | 32 | 451 | 5 |
| 39 |
|
KC | 57.4% | 16 | 81 | 1,159 | 5 |
| 40 |
|
IND | 57.3% | 16 | 75 | 960 | 4 |
| 41 |
|
MIA | 57.0% | 16 | 81 | 1,214 | 6 |
| 42 |
|
BUF | 56.7% | 16 | 76 | 1,004 | 7 |
| 43 |
|
NE | 56.7% | 14 | 51 | 702 | 5 |
| 44 |
|
NYJ | 56.5% | 16 | 65 | 815 | 5 |
| 45 |
|
CIN | 56.5% | 15 | 65 | 1,057 | 7 |
| 46 |
|
IND | 55.7% | 16 | 54 | 514 | 1 |
| 47 |
|
LV | 55.7% | 15 | 64 | 975 | 4 |
| 48 |
|
PIT | 55.6% | 16 | 69 | 1,108 | 2 |
| 49 |
|
CIN | 54.4% | 12 | 37 | 317 | 3 |
| 50 |
|
BAL | 53.8% | 14 | 57 | 887 | 3 |
1–50 of 68Next →