2009-2010 NBA True Shooting Percentage Leaders
Shooting efficiency including free throws
Amir Johnson led the NBA in true shooting percentage in 2009-2010 with 63.9%, 0.8 percentage points ahead of Chris Andersen (63.1%).
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2009-2010
Amir Johnson
TOR
63.9%
True Shooting Percentage
0.8% clear of Chris Andersen
Showing True Shooting Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | TS% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
TOR | 63.9% | 82 | 208 | 334 | 62.3% |
| 2 |
|
DEN | 63.1% | 76 | 142 | 251 | 56.6% |
| 3 |
|
DEN | 63.1% | 82 | 421 | 717 | 58.7% |
| 4 |
|
ORL | 63.0% | 82 | 510 | 834 | 61.2% |
| 5 |
|
WAS | 62.3% | 54 | 217 | 433 | 50.1% |
| 6 |
|
PHX | 62.1% | 51 | 171 | 291 | 58.8% |
| 7 |
|
UTA | 62.0% | 52 | 138 | 280 | 49.3% |
| 8 |
|
MEM | 61.7% | 69 | 378 | 651 | 58.1% |
| 9 |
|
DAL | 61.7% | 56 | 155 | 299 | 51.8% |
| 10 |
|
OKC | 61.6% | 75 | 182 | 309 | 58.9% |
| 11 |
|
PHX | 61.5% | 81 | 499 | 985 | 50.7% |
| 12 |
|
PHX | 61.5% | 82 | 704 | 1,264 | 55.7% |
| 13 |
|
GSW | 61.5% | 70 | 457 | 886 | 51.6% |
| 14 |
|
BOS | 61.3% | 78 | 314 | 522 | 60.2% |
| 15 |
|
BOS | 61.3% | 71 | 409 | 867 | 47.2% |
| 16 |
|
PHX | 61.2% | 82 | 225 | 490 | 45.9% |
| 17 |
|
LAL | 60.8% | 65 | 392 | 688 | 57.0% |
| 18 |
|
OKC | 60.7% | 82 | 794 | 1,668 | 47.6% |
| 19 |
|
ORL | 60.6% | 82 | 243 | 553 | 43.9% |
| 20 |
|
CLE | 60.4% | 76 | 768 | 1,528 | 50.3% |
| 21 |
|
BOS | 60.1% | 80 | 464 | 973 | 47.7% |
| 22 |
|
DEN | 60.1% | 73 | 402 | 962 | 41.8% |
| 23 |
|
SAC | 60.0% | 80 | 499 | 931 | 53.6% |
| 24 |
|
DEN | 60.0% | 65 | 201 | 390 | 51.5% |
| 25 |
|
MIN | 60.0% | 73 | 169 | 303 | 55.8% |
| 26 |
|
UTA | 59.9% | 78 | 617 | 1,098 | 56.2% |
| 27 |
|
TOR | 59.9% | 82 | 323 | 671 | 48.1% |
| 28 |
|
LAC | 59.9% | 75 | 226 | 397 | 56.9% |
| 29 |
|
CLE | 59.8% | 76 | 267 | 467 | 57.2% |
| 30 |
|
PHX | 59.8% | 81 | 317 | 703 | 45.1% |
| 31 |
|
GSW | 59.7% | 69 | 329 | 703 | 46.8% |
| 32 |
|
ATL | 59.4% | 81 | 467 | 847 | 55.1% |
| 33 |
|
LAL | 59.3% | 65 | 452 | 844 | 53.6% |
| 34 |
|
TOR | 59.2% | 70 | 600 | 1,158 | 51.8% |
| 35 |
|
UTA | 59.2% | 82 | 273 | 565 | 48.3% |
| 36 |
|
GSW | 58.8% | 24 | 140 | 283 | 49.5% |
| 37 |
|
UTA | 58.8% | 58 | 244 | 482 | 50.6% |
| 38 |
|
DAL | 58.8% | 77 | 276 | 491 | 56.2% |
| 39 |
|
CHA | 58.6% | 76 | 456 | 943 | 48.4% |
| 40 |
|
IND | 58.5% | 72 | 384 | 813 | 47.2% |
| 41 |
|
NYK | 58.4% | 81 | 686 | 1,258 | 54.5% |
| 42 |
|
SAS | 58.4% | 75 | 398 | 903 | 44.1% |
| 43 |
|
NOH | 58.4% | 45 | 314 | 637 | 49.3% |
| 44 |
|
SAS | 58.1% | 65 | 166 | 372 | 44.6% |
| 45 |
|
CLE | 58.0% | 81 | 289 | 522 | 55.4% |
| 46 |
|
CLE | 58.0% | 69 | 378 | 855 | 44.2% |
| 47 |
|
CHA | 57.8% | 58 | 189 | 342 | 55.3% |
| 48 |
|
DAL | 57.8% | 81 | 720 | 1,496 | 48.1% |
| 49 |
|
DAL | 57.7% | 80 | 284 | 671 | 42.3% |
| 50 |
|
DEN | 57.6% | 82 | 272 | 585 | 46.5% |
1–50 of 267Next →