2008-2009 NBA True Shooting Percentage Leaders
Shooting efficiency including free throws
Erick Dampier led the NBA in true shooting percentage in 2008-2009 with 66.4%, 1.2 percentage points ahead of Joel Przybilla (65.2%).
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2008-2009
Erick Dampier
DAL
66.4%
True Shooting Percentage
1.2% clear of Joel Przybilla
Showing True Shooting Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | TS% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
DAL | 66.4% | 80 | 182 | 280 | 65.0% |
| 2 |
|
POR | 65.2% | 82 | 168 | 269 | 62.5% |
| 3 |
|
DEN | 64.5% | 77 | 428 | 709 | 60.4% |
| 4 |
|
HOU | 63.4% | 69 | 240 | 418 | 57.4% |
| 5 |
|
BOS | 62.4% | 79 | 499 | 1,040 | 48.0% |
| 6 |
|
PHX | 62.3% | 75 | 512 | 841 | 60.9% |
| 7 |
|
HOU | 61.8% | 77 | 566 | 1,032 | 54.8% |
| 8 |
|
LAL | 61.7% | 81 | 592 | 1,045 | 56.7% |
| 9 |
|
PHX | 61.7% | 53 | 404 | 749 | 53.9% |
| 10 |
|
PHX | 61.5% | 74 | 428 | 851 | 50.3% |
| 11 |
|
IND | 61.4% | 73 | 364 | 767 | 47.5% |
| 12 |
|
TOR | 61.3% | 68 | 320 | 644 | 49.7% |
| 13 |
|
ORL | 61.2% | 42 | 267 | 531 | 50.3% |
| 14 |
|
SAS | 61.1% | 81 | 266 | 536 | 49.6% |
| 15 |
|
DEN | 60.8% | 71 | 160 | 292 | 54.8% |
| 16 |
|
LAC | 60.6% | 71 | 176 | 396 | 44.4% |
| 17 |
|
SAC | 60.1% | 51 | 341 | 811 | 42.0% |
| 18 |
|
ORL | 60.0% | 79 | 560 | 979 | 57.2% |
| 19 |
|
NOH | 59.9% | 78 | 631 | 1,255 | 50.3% |
| 20 |
|
POR | 59.9% | 61 | 198 | 351 | 56.4% |
| 21 |
|
MIN | 59.9% | 74 | 289 | 514 | 56.2% |
| 22 |
|
OKC | 59.9% | 71 | 243 | 428 | 56.8% |
| 23 |
|
LAL | 59.8% | 50 | 281 | 502 | 56.0% |
| 24 |
|
NJN | 59.6% | 71 | 198 | 441 | 44.9% |
| 25 |
|
SAS | 59.4% | 44 | 223 | 491 | 45.4% |
| 26 |
|
CHI | 59.4% | 80 | 207 | 372 | 55.6% |
| 27 |
|
LAC | 59.3% | 78 | 411 | 901 | 45.6% |
| 28 |
|
DEN | 59.2% | 79 | 410 | 980 | 41.8% |
| 29 |
|
BOS | 59.2% | 81 | 249 | 560 | 44.5% |
| 30 |
|
UTA | 59.2% | 72 | 431 | 888 | 48.5% |
| 31 |
|
CLE | 59.1% | 81 | 789 | 1,613 | 48.9% |
| 32 |
|
BOS | 59.1% | 76 | 276 | 478 | 57.7% |
| 33 |
|
BOS | 59.1% | 70 | 177 | 338 | 52.4% |
| 34 |
|
MEM | 59.0% | 82 | 350 | 661 | 53.0% |
| 35 |
|
NYK | 59.0% | 81 | 522 | 951 | 54.9% |
| 36 |
|
MIN | 58.8% | 73 | 264 | 548 | 48.2% |
| 37 |
|
GSW | 58.8% | 67 | 255 | 534 | 47.8% |
| 38 |
|
CLE | 58.8% | 81 | 526 | 1,126 | 46.7% |
| 39 |
|
POR | 58.8% | 78 | 268 | 630 | 42.5% |
| 40 |
|
PHX | 58.8% | 70 | 366 | 759 | 48.2% |
| 41 |
|
CHA | 58.7% | 72 | 267 | 621 | 43.0% |
| 42 |
|
MIL | 58.6% | 36 | 183 | 317 | 57.7% |
| 43 |
|
GSW | 58.5% | 62 | 308 | 533 | 57.8% |
| 44 |
|
CHA | 58.5% | 71 | 389 | 811 | 48.0% |
| 45 |
|
IND | 58.4% | 67 | 571 | 1,277 | 44.7% |
| 46 |
|
PHX | 58.4% | 82 | 390 | 745 | 52.3% |
| 47 |
|
BOS | 58.2% | 81 | 540 | 1,181 | 45.7% |
| 48 |
|
GSW | 58.2% | 51 | 292 | 634 | 46.1% |
| 49 |
|
CLE | 58.1% | 74 | 179 | 398 | 45.0% |
| 50 |
|
NOH | 58.1% | 45 | 160 | 283 | 56.5% |
1–50 of 258Next →