2008-2009 NBA Effective FG Percentage Leaders
Field goal percentage weighting threes
Shaquille O'Neal led the NBA in effective fg percentage in 2008-2009 with 60.9%, 0.5 percentage points ahead of Nene (60.4%). It was one of 6 times Shaquille O'Neal led in effective fg percentage.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2008-2009
Shaquille O'Neal
PHX
60.9%
Effective FG Percentage
0.5% clear of Nene
Showing Effective FG Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | eFG% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
PHX | 60.9% | 75 | 512 | 841 | 60.9% |
| 2 |
|
DEN | 60.4% | 77 | 428 | 709 | 60.4% |
| 3 |
|
IND | 58.0% | 73 | 364 | 767 | 47.5% |
| 4 |
|
GSW | 57.8% | 62 | 308 | 533 | 57.8% |
| 5 |
|
BOS | 57.5% | 79 | 499 | 1,040 | 48.0% |
| 6 |
|
ORL | 57.2% | 79 | 560 | 979 | 57.2% |
| 7 |
|
LAL | 56.7% | 81 | 592 | 1,045 | 56.7% |
| 8 |
|
PHX | 56.6% | 74 | 428 | 851 | 50.3% |
| 9 |
|
CHA | 56.1% | 82 | 433 | 772 | 56.1% |
| 10 |
|
TOR | 56.1% | 68 | 320 | 644 | 49.7% |
| 11 |
|
CHA | 54.9% | 81 | 448 | 884 | 50.7% |
| 12 |
|
HOU | 54.9% | 77 | 566 | 1,032 | 54.8% |
| 13 |
|
NYK | 54.9% | 81 | 522 | 951 | 54.9% |
| 14 |
|
CLE | 54.8% | 81 | 526 | 1,126 | 46.7% |
| 15 |
|
PHX | 54.4% | 72 | 465 | 974 | 47.7% |
| 16 |
|
PHX | 54.2% | 70 | 366 | 759 | 48.2% |
| 17 |
|
PHX | 54.1% | 53 | 404 | 749 | 53.9% |
| 18 |
|
DEN | 54.1% | 81 | 424 | 950 | 44.6% |
| 19 |
|
ORL | 54.0% | 79 | 478 | 1,089 | 43.9% |
| 20 |
|
PHX | 54.0% | 82 | 390 | 745 | 52.3% |
| 21 |
|
UTA | 53.6% | 72 | 431 | 888 | 48.5% |
| 22 |
|
DAL | 53.5% | 74 | 541 | 1,168 | 46.3% |
| 23 |
|
UTA | 53.4% | 76 | 400 | 749 | 53.4% |
| 24 |
|
BOS | 53.2% | 57 | 393 | 740 | 53.1% |
| 25 |
|
SAS | 53.2% | 81 | 301 | 689 | 43.7% |
| 26 |
|
NJN | 53.1% | 82 | 448 | 844 | 53.1% |
| 27 |
|
HOU | 53.1% | 82 | 424 | 799 | 53.1% |
| 28 |
|
CLE | 53.0% | 81 | 789 | 1,613 | 48.9% |
| 29 |
|
CHI | 53.0% | 79 | 516 | 1,093 | 47.2% |
| 30 |
|
MEM | 53.0% | 82 | 350 | 661 | 53.0% |
| 31 |
|
LAC | 52.9% | 78 | 411 | 901 | 45.6% |
| 32 |
|
NOH | 52.8% | 78 | 631 | 1,255 | 50.3% |
| 33 |
|
SAS | 52.6% | 82 | 349 | 822 | 42.5% |
| 34 |
|
ATL | 52.5% | 67 | 312 | 594 | 52.5% |
| 35 |
|
PHI | 52.4% | 75 | 475 | 960 | 49.5% |
| 36 |
|
UTA | 52.2% | 81 | 421 | 828 | 50.8% |
| 37 |
|
NOH | 52.1% | 82 | 348 | 803 | 43.3% |
| 38 |
|
CHI | 52.1% | 82 | 598 | 1,315 | 45.5% |
| 39 |
|
GSW | 52.0% | 74 | 392 | 845 | 46.4% |
| 40 |
|
IND | 51.8% | 67 | 571 | 1,277 | 44.7% |
| 41 |
|
ATL | 51.8% | 79 | 437 | 1,005 | 43.5% |
| 42 |
|
MIA | 51.8% | 75 | 333 | 643 | 51.8% |
| 43 |
|
MIA | 51.6% | 79 | 854 | 1,739 | 49.1% |
| 44 |
|
LAL | 51.6% | 78 | 346 | 703 | 49.2% |
| 45 |
|
BOS | 51.4% | 80 | 383 | 759 | 50.5% |
| 46 |
|
SAS | 51.3% | 72 | 639 | 1,263 | 50.6% |
| 47 |
|
TOR | 51.2% | 78 | 431 | 958 | 45.0% |
| 48 |
|
POR | 51.2% | 78 | 633 | 1,318 | 48.0% |
| 49 |
|
OKC | 51.0% | 74 | 661 | 1,390 | 47.6% |
| 50 |
|
NYK | 50.9% | 73 | 532 | 1,212 | 43.9% |
1–50 of 119Next →