2012-2013 NBA Effective FG Percentage Leaders
Field goal percentage weighting threes
DeAndre Jordan led the NBA in effective fg percentage in 2012-2013 with 64.3%, 4.0 percentage points ahead of LeBron James (60.3%). It stands 48th among all single seasons in NBA history. It was one of 5 times DeAndre Jordan led in effective fg percentage.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2012-2013
DeAndre Jordan
LAC
64.3%
Effective FG Percentage
4.0% clear of LeBron James
Showing Effective FG Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | eFG% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LAC | 64.3% | 82 | 314 | 488 | 64.3% |
| 2 |
|
MIA | 60.3% | 76 | 765 | 1,354 | 56.5% |
| 3 |
|
DET | 59.4% | 73 | 312 | 635 | 49.1% |
| 4 |
|
OKC | 58.6% | 80 | 446 | 778 | 57.3% |
| 5 |
|
LAL | 57.9% | 76 | 470 | 813 | 57.8% |
| 6 |
|
DEN | 57.6% | 79 | 303 | 527 | 57.5% |
| 7 |
|
HOU | 56.7% | 76 | 456 | 939 | 48.6% |
| 8 |
|
POR | 56.2% | 80 | 418 | 744 | 56.2% |
| 9 |
|
SAS | 56.0% | 81 | 315 | 563 | 56.0% |
| 10 |
|
OKC | 55.9% | 81 | 731 | 1,433 | 51.0% |
| 11 |
|
TOR | 55.9% | 81 | 336 | 606 | 55.4% |
| 12 |
|
SAC | 55.3% | 71 | 319 | 623 | 51.2% |
| 13 |
|
DEN | 55.2% | 80 | 380 | 689 | 55.2% |
| 14 |
|
OKC | 55.1% | 77 | 350 | 778 | 45.0% |
| 15 |
|
GSW | 54.9% | 78 | 626 | 1,388 | 45.1% |
| 16 |
|
PHX | 54.7% | 79 | 313 | 669 | 46.8% |
| 17 |
|
MIA | 54.6% | 74 | 485 | 907 | 53.5% |
| 18 |
|
ATL | 54.5% | 74 | 576 | 1,060 | 54.3% |
| 19 |
|
LAC | 54.4% | 80 | 312 | 675 | 46.2% |
| 20 |
|
HOU | 54.1% | 82 | 332 | 614 | 54.1% |
| 21 |
|
GSW | 54.1% | 81 | 325 | 602 | 54.0% |
| 22 |
|
LAC | 54.1% | 80 | 577 | 1,072 | 53.8% |
| 23 |
|
POR | 54.0% | 69 | 352 | 808 | 43.6% |
| 24 |
|
NOH | 53.4% | 82 | 384 | 719 | 53.4% |
| 25 |
|
SAS | 53.4% | 66 | 519 | 995 | 52.2% |
| 26 |
|
PHI | 53.2% | 76 | 509 | 958 | 53.1% |
| 27 |
|
DAL | 53.1% | 67 | 355 | 690 | 51.4% |
| 28 |
|
DAL | 53.0% | 81 | 372 | 855 | 43.5% |
| 29 |
|
MIA | 52.8% | 69 | 569 | 1,093 | 52.1% |
| 30 |
|
MIL | 52.8% | 78 | 382 | 880 | 43.4% |
| 31 |
|
LAC | 52.6% | 70 | 412 | 856 | 48.1% |
| 32 |
|
POR | 52.2% | 73 | 352 | 833 | 42.3% |
| 33 |
|
MIL | 52.1% | 73 | 371 | 803 | 46.2% |
| 34 |
|
BKN | 52.1% | 74 | 570 | 1,094 | 52.1% |
| 35 |
|
SAC | 52.0% | 72 | 332 | 774 | 42.9% |
| 36 |
|
MIN | 52.0% | 62 | 385 | 741 | 52.0% |
| 37 |
|
GSW | 51.9% | 79 | 602 | 1,160 | 51.9% |
| 38 |
|
NOH | 51.9% | 81 | 472 | 1,115 | 42.3% |
| 39 |
|
ORL | 51.9% | 77 | 461 | 889 | 51.9% |
| 40 |
|
DAL | 51.9% | 82 | 461 | 1,026 | 44.9% |
| 41 |
|
IND | 51.8% | 76 | 386 | 871 | 44.3% |
| 42 |
|
NOH | 51.6% | 64 | 349 | 676 | 51.6% |
| 43 |
|
DAL | 51.6% | 53 | 343 | 728 | 47.1% |
| 44 |
|
BKN | 51.6% | 78 | 495 | 1,124 | 44.0% |
| 45 |
|
BKN | 51.4% | 82 | 346 | 676 | 51.2% |
| 46 |
|
LAC | 51.3% | 78 | 305 | 720 | 42.4% |
| 47 |
|
LAC | 51.1% | 76 | 445 | 1,016 | 43.8% |
| 48 |
|
BOS | 51.0% | 81 | 376 | 806 | 46.7% |
| 49 |
|
CHI | 51.0% | 82 | 399 | 921 | 43.3% |
| 50 |
|
GSW | 50.9% | 82 | 508 | 1,205 | 42.2% |
1–50 of 123Next →