2019-2020 NBA Three-Point Percentage Leaders
Share of three-pointers made
George Hill led the NBA in three-point percentage in 2019-2020 with 46.0%, 0.7 percentage points ahead of JJ Redick (45.3%). It stands 41st among all single seasons in NBA history.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2019-2020
George Hill
MIL
46.0%
Three-Point Percentage
0.7% clear of JJ Redick
Showing Three-Point Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | 3P% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
MIL | 46.0% | 59 | 194 | 376 | 51.6% |
| 2 |
|
NOP | 45.3% | 60 | 286 | 631 | 45.3% |
| 3 |
|
DAL | 45.2% | 64 | 284 | 574 | 49.5% |
| 4 |
|
MIA | 44.6% | 73 | 323 | 687 | 47.0% |
| 5 |
|
IND | 43.5% | 69 | 267 | 547 | 48.8% |
| 6 |
|
WAS | 42.4% | 54 | 265 | 610 | 43.4% |
| 7 |
|
BKN | 42.4% | 69 | 381 | 784 | 48.6% |
| 8 |
|
SAC | 41.9% | 72 | 314 | 653 | 48.1% |
| 9 |
|
POR | 41.8% | 61 | 196 | 441 | 44.4% |
| 10 |
|
MIL | 41.8% | 58 | 126 | 293 | 43.0% |
| 11 |
|
MIL | 41.5% | 62 | 471 | 947 | 49.7% |
| 12 |
|
UTA | 41.4% | 63 | 418 | 935 | 44.7% |
| 13 |
|
WAS | 41.3% | 40 | 174 | 426 | 40.8% |
| 14 |
|
LAC | 41.2% | 48 | 343 | 782 | 43.9% |
| 15 |
|
MIN | 41.2% | 35 | 316 | 622 | 50.8% |
| 16 |
|
LAC | 40.8% | 62 | 355 | 810 | 43.8% |
| 17 |
|
CHA | 40.7% | 63 | 398 | 941 | 42.3% |
| 18 |
|
MIA | 40.6% | 67 | 184 | 398 | 46.2% |
| 19 |
|
OKC | 40.5% | 62 | 358 | 817 | 43.8% |
| 20 |
|
IND | 40.5% | 73 | 208 | 486 | 42.8% |
| 21 |
|
DET | 40.4% | 56 | 166 | 405 | 41.0% |
| 22 |
|
BOS | 40.3% | 66 | 552 | 1,226 | 45.0% |
| 23 |
|
IND | 40.3% | 67 | 534 | 997 | 53.6% |
| 24 |
|
PHI | 40.2% | 72 | 242 | 563 | 43.0% |
| 25 |
|
DET | 40.2% | 59 | 170 | 382 | 44.5% |
| 26 |
|
POR | 40.1% | 66 | 624 | 1,349 | 46.3% |
| 27 |
|
HOU | 40.0% | 71 | 242 | 545 | 44.4% |
| 28 |
|
UTA | 40.0% | 66 | 141 | 322 | 43.8% |
| 29 |
|
UTA | 39.9% | 72 | 246 | 553 | 44.5% |
| 30 |
|
TOR | 39.9% | 52 | 296 | 598 | 49.5% |
| 31 |
|
DET | 39.9% | 66 | 236 | 542 | 43.5% |
| 32 |
|
ORL | 39.9% | 66 | 434 | 929 | 46.7% |
| 33 |
|
DAL | 39.8% | 71 | 384 | 884 | 43.4% |
| 34 |
|
MEM | 39.4% | 57 | 353 | 753 | 46.9% |
| 35 |
|
SAC | 39.4% | 72 | 498 | 1,162 | 42.9% |
| 36 |
|
IND | 39.4% | 66 | 233 | 563 | 41.4% |
| 37 |
|
PHI | 39.1% | 62 | 288 | 592 | 48.6% |
| 38 |
|
NOP | 39.1% | 62 | 507 | 1,096 | 46.3% |
| 39 |
|
TOR | 39.0% | 54 | 319 | 773 | 41.3% |
| 40 |
|
TOR | 39.0% | 69 | 286 | 566 | 50.5% |
| 41 |
|
PHX | 39.0% | 57 | 176 | 405 | 43.5% |
| 42 |
|
MIA | 38.9% | 55 | 270 | 631 | 42.8% |
| 43 |
|
DEN | 38.9% | 71 | 303 | 634 | 47.8% |
| 44 |
|
SAS | 38.8% | 63 | 242 | 581 | 41.7% |
| 45 |
|
TOR | 38.8% | 72 | 199 | 436 | 45.6% |
| 46 |
|
LAC | 38.8% | 51 | 147 | 341 | 43.1% |
| 47 |
|
MIN | 38.8% | 55 | 227 | 534 | 42.5% |
| 48 |
|
LAC | 38.7% | 63 | 151 | 352 | 42.9% |
| 49 |
|
LAL | 38.6% | 58 | 203 | 458 | 44.3% |
| 50 |
|
PHI | 38.5% | 66 | 321 | 768 | 41.8% |
1–50 of 142Next →